Syllogism: Possibility Cases Questions with Solutions

A regular Syllogism conclusion has to hold in EVERY valid diagram to follow. A possibility conclusion only needs to hold in AT LEAST ONE valid diagram consistent with the statements — a much lower bar, and a different question entirely. Here’s the approach, four fully worked examples covering each pattern, and a few to try yourself.

The approach, quickly

  • A possibility conclusion ("it is possible that...") is valid if you can draw even ONE diagram consistent with the statements where it holds — it does not need to hold in every diagram, unlike a regular "definitely follows" conclusion.
  • A possibility conclusion is NOT valid only when it’s impossible in every single diagram consistent with the statements — meaning the statements actively rule it out, not just fail to guarantee it.
  • Two "Some" statements, or a "Some" combined with another statement, usually leave real freedom in how the circles overlap — this is where both a positive and a negative possibility often turn out valid at once.
  • When one category is fully nested inside another that’s fully separate from a third (an "All" chained into a "No"), the nested category and the separate one can never overlap in any diagram — ruling out any possibility conclusion that requires them to.

Worked examples

1. Statements: Some pens are books. Some books are tables. Possibilities: I. It is possible that some pens are tables. II. It is possible that no pens are tables.

Solution

  1. The "books that are pens" and the "books that are tables" could be the same books (making some pens tables) or entirely different books (making no pens tables) — both are consistent with the statements.

Answer: Both possibilities are valid

2. Statements: No pen is a book. All books are tables. Possibilities: I. It is possible that some tables are pens. II. It is possible that all tables are pens.

Solution

  1. Tables include all the books, but could also include other members beyond just books — those other members could be pens, so "some tables are pens" is possible.
  2. But the book-tables can never be pens (since no pen is a book), so not every table can possibly be a pen — "all tables are pens" is ruled out.

Answer: Only possibility I is valid

3. Statements: All pens are books. No book is a table. Possibilities: I. It is possible that some pens are tables. II. It is possible that all tables are pens.

Solution

  1. Since every pen is a book, and no book is a table, pens and tables can never overlap in any valid diagram — ruling out both "some pens are tables" and the stronger "all tables are pens."

Answer: Neither possibility is valid

4. Statements: Some pens are books. No book is a table. Possibilities: I. It is possible that all pens are tables. II. It is possible that some pens are tables.

Solution

  1. Since books are never tables, any pen that is also a book cannot be a table — and "some pens are books" guarantees at least one such pen, so not every pen can possibly be a table, ruling out "all pens are tables."
  2. But pens outside that book-overlap aren’t constrained at all — some of them could be tables, making "some pens are tables" possible.

Answer: Only possibility II is valid

Try these yourself

Check whether each possibility can be drawn in at least one valid diagram, then check against the answer.

1. Statements: Some pens are books. All books are tables. Possibilities: I. It is possible that some pens are tables. II. It is possible that no pens are tables.

Answer: Only possibility I is valid

2. Statements: No pen is a book. Some books are tables. Possibilities: I. It is possible that some pens are tables. II. It is possible that no pens are tables.

Answer: Both possibilities are valid

3. Statements: All pens are books. All books are tables. Possibilities: I. It is possible that all pens are tables. II. It is possible that no pens are tables.

Answer: Only possibility I is valid

Where this comes up

Syllogism: Possibility Cases is a regular topic in the Reasoning/General Intelligence section of every exam Pariksha Saathi covers — SSC CGL, SSC MTS, SSC CHSL, IBPS PO, IBPS Clerk, SBI PO and SBI Clerk — building on the standard Syllogism lesson.

Practice more Syllogism: Possibility Cases questions

This page covers the approach and a handful of worked examples. Pariksha Saathi has full topic-wise practice sets for Syllogism: Possibility Cases (and every other Reasoning/Quant/English topic) with instant scoring and explanations — free, no account required.

Practice Syllogism Possibility Cases free →